Semester Proposal

Lightweight Printable

Composite Structures

MS_DT Pracitcum Research Proposal
University of Michigan
Winter 2013
Jeremy Luebker

Abstract

This proposal lays out the trajectory of research based around the fabrication of light-weight structures formulated from a composite of plastic and fabric. The work proposes to build upon the current vein of research in extruded plastics to create a viable method of construction utilizing this method of fabrication.

Context

There have been several project in recent years at various academic institutions such as SCI-Arc, MIT, and the University of Michigan that have sought to explore the possibilities and properties of CNC extruded martials. This research builds on the ideas inherent to 3D printing technologies and seeks to both scale up and explore a variety of material possibilities such as plastics and concrete. Most of these projects have been facilitated through a process of attaching either a repurposed industrial plastic extruder or a custom designed extruder to a multi-axis robotic arm.

The projects can be divided in to two categories: first expanding 3D printing technologies, and second, exploring the properties of extrusion. The first category of projects deals with the direct translation of digital three-dimensional forms into physical manifestations.  The second deals with the affect of processes extrusion and attempting to push the extents of the physical properties of the material. None of these projects, however, work with this technique and material as an actual building material.

Previous Exploration

Fabric tests and selection

During the fall semester of 2012 at the University of Michigan, in collaboration with Jake Newsum, experiments with this material and technique were begun. This method encompasses several crucial elements. This project entails printing extruded plastic on fabric to create lightweight structural panels.

Fabrics

The first element of this technique is reliant on the fabric selection. A variety of fabrics were tested including an assortment of natural materials and synthetic. The finding was that the plastic didn’t bond with the fabric. Synthetic fabrics had better success on some of the selections. It was found that on polyesters tend to fuse with the Copolymer Polypropylene used in the extrusion.  Other fabrics such as rip-stop didn’t fuse at all. The conclusion is that fabrics of similar plastic composition as plastic fuses the best.

Plastic Printing Techniques

As with all the extrusion projects, the process relies heavily on two elements: the first is temperature and something that has been termed “smash”, or vertical offset. The temperature dictates the strength of the fusion with the fabric; it was found that the greater the temperature the greater the bond. However, an excessive temperature could also cause too much penetration with the fabric, resulting in bonding with the substrate material and ultimately in some undesirable bonding and staining. The ideal temperature range was determined to be between 180 and 210 degrees Fahrenheit.

The second element, the vertical offset, determines the structural rigidity as well as cohesiveness of fabric accumulation. Two techniques were discovered, is to print above fabric, the second is the print with a determined offset less than the height of the printed plastic in successive layers, inducing “smash”.   The ideal offset was found to be about 1/32 of an inch. This technique, although the more structural of the two, causes a limited amount of distortion due to drag and pinching of the fabric.

Structure

The structure of the panels is determined based on size of the panels. This in turn determines the techniques necessary. Smaller panels, roughly 12 by 12 inches can be made structural with a single line profile of plastic. However it was found that smashing plastic provides better shear resistance. A second technique developed was filleting the corners, this proved to be more successful than printing diagonals across the panels. The most successful structural solution, however, was a combination of these techniques. A single layer of smashed plastic directly on the fabric provided shear resistance while a layer of plastic with a larger offset directly on top of this provided a structural cross section. Adding a fillet to this allowed for panels of significant strength.  One structural test of a 6 inch by 6 inch box, earlier in the process tested at over fifty times its own weight.

3D Assemblies

The difficulty this technique was discovered in assembling the panels in to folded geometric prisms. The method has resolution issues resulting in warping and infidelity of panel assembly. Connection tests focused primarily on attaching contained geometric volumes into an aggregated assembly. Attachment methods utilized consisted primarily of internal sowing and a pull-string method, which would ideally allow for minimal expression of the connections. However, further testing will be required to both improved the fidelity of the printing process as well as alternate connection methods.

Composite

One of the more significant discoveries during this process was the behavioral qualities of the plastic fabric fusion. By altering and varying the tool paths to result in open geometries rather than profile lines, it was discovered that the assemblies behaved more as a composite. The fabric provided flexibility and tensile restraint while the plastic provided rigidity and stiffness. Depending on the tool path arrangement, most of these composites took on spring like characteristics.

Light Weight Structures

The success of this project is in the ability to create structural components without the use of fixtures or precut fabric patterns.

Proposal Project

This semester the work is proposed to be continued and a variety of methods to build upon the calibration of last semester. While developing methods to improve the techniques and fidelity of the current methods, further exploration of the possibilities of this technique will be explored.

3d Panels

While the previous semester’s panels were limited to flat, two dimensional prints, this semester, explorations into three dimensional panels will be conducted. Two potential methods are apparent: the first is pressing the printing the plastic on loose fabric stretched on a frame, using the pressure of the extruder nozzle. The second is to stretch the fabric over a three dimensional forms.

Robotics

Another opportunity that is quickly apparent is the incorporation of robotics. Taking advantage of the open fabric surfaces at the center of the panels to create apertures is the first of these opportunities and the second is taking advantage of the light weight qualities of the panels to create dynamic surfaces.

Composite

The alternate and or parallel priority is to further the explorations of the properties of the composite. This will encompass most of the same issues as the development of the panels. But will also include calibration of the dynamic qualities.

Measure of Deformation and Simulation

The calibration of these qualities will require the cataloging of the taxonomy of the spring qualities associated with differentiating tool paths. Once this is accomplished these properties could then potentially be simulated allowing for incorporation into further design opportunities.

Secondary Material Interfacing and Self-Structuring Solutions

Both of these opportunities require further exploration of structural solutions. The first is to develop methods of interfacing with other materials such as wood or metal structural systems. The second solution is to continue to explorations of self-structuring methods utilizing plastic and fabric.

Fidelity

All of these explorations require further exploration in improvement of the fidelity of the printed tool paths. One of the first steps is to explore improved methods of securing the fabric to reduce the drag. The use of magnets has potential. The second avenue of improvement is to explore increased control of the plastic extrusion.  One of the first apparent solutions is to experiment with alternate nozzle systems for the extruder. Decreasing the diameter of the nozzle and experimenting with forming the hot plastic as it is extruded will be the first of the explorations.

Final Demonstration Project

The culmination of this experimentation would be presented as situational design situated on a yet to be selected site. The sited project will take on the form of a self-structuring system possibly forming an enclosure or pavilion.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

PDF VERSION DOWNLOAD: jluebker_proposal

Bibliography:

Sciarc-

http://xahkdesign.tumblr.com/

http://wewanttolearn.wordpress.com/2011/10/17/robotics-lab-at-sci-arc-robots-in-architecture-and-robofold/

MIT-

http://www.twylah.com/mikel_llc/topics/extruder

mich-

http://www.mhsenkow.org/architecture/pizza.html

others:

http://www.iaacblog.com/maa2012-2013-digital-fabrication/

http://www.iaacblog.com/maa2011-2012-ds3digitaltectonics/

http://ianwongresearch.blogspot.com/2012/08/rob-eales-masters-exhibition.h

Plastic netting: composite

http://www.ec21.com/product-details/Plastic-Netting-Machine-Plastic-Mesh–3398489.html

http://maishiwiremesh.en.alibaba.com/product/536736416-211912594/4mm_opening_plastic_extruded_meshes.html

extruder:

http://www.google.com/imgres?start=878&hl=en&safe=off&sa=X&tbo=d&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS444US444&tbm=isch&tbnid=_FCesxVuOk9MwM:&imgrefurl=http://www.props.eric-hart.com/tools/who-invented-the-hot-glue-gun/&docid=IoyweozqHIUDmM&imgurl=http://www.props.eric-hart.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/myers-extrusion-gun-500×307.png&w=500&h=307&ei=quvlUJ-uL8mZiQLN84DgDw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=806&vpy=204&dur=4510&hovh=176&hovw=287&tx=192&ty=71&sig=106567133850234711803&page=27&tbnh=139&tbnw=227&ndsp=39&ved=1t:429,r:88,s:800,i:268&biw=1324&bih=800

http://www.hotairtools.in.th/products_hand_held_extrusion_welders.php

3d printing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfbhdZKPHro

http://www.makerbot.com/blog/2012/03/15/impressive-3d-printed-curved-concrete-shapes/

http://architectstables.com/archives/tag/holland

http://www.dirkvanderkooij.nl/

http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2012-10/new-breed-3-d-printing-builds-objects-top-down

~ by jluebker on January 10, 2013.

2 Responses to “Semester Proposal”

  1. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you penning this
    write-up and also the rest of the website is also very good.

  2. […] See Semester Proposal […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 245 other followers

%d bloggers like this: