~ by jluebker on April 4, 2013.
Posted in Uncategorized Tags: architectural representation, daniel libeskind, evolo, neil spiller, radical architecure
2 of these (the radical) are people, the other one is a company that puts on a competition. If this was labelled correctly, you’d be comparing the two radical guys, to some random kid. Which isn’t a fair, useful or productive comparison at all.
Similarly, this post is an example of exactly what you’re supposedly criticizing: bad representation, except this is bad criticizing. In response to this, I should post an excerpt from Learning from Las Vegas, Junkspace, and then this post. The first two being good and the last being bad forms of criticism…unless of course you think the last is also radical which in that case, never mind, cause it sure isn’t.
TEWL said this on April 6, 2013 at 5:52 pm | Reply
This triptych is simply suggesting that the current stream of “radical representations” of “innovative” architecture which everyone seems to think is something new is in fact not. It is in fact a continuation of a vein of aesthetics that has been around for a while. This is a visual critique of what we consider to be radical and innovative.
jluebker said this on April 6, 2013 at 9:57 pm | Reply
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 2,176 other followers
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.